Business between the Company and the Members of the Board; Conflicts of Interest
Any dealings that may exist between the Company and its Board Members are subject to the provisions of Art. 397 CCC, and may only be entered into if so authorised by a resolution of the Board of Directors, for which the interested Director cannot vote, and that authorisation must be preceded by a favourable opinion from the Audit Committee.
Taking into account the election of Andrzej Szlęzak (partner in the firm of lawyers Sołtysiński Kawecki & Szlęzak (SK&S), one of the Jerónimo Martins Group’s External Legal Counsels) for the position of Director of Jerónimo Martins for the term 2013-2015, the Board of Directors authorized, since 2013, within the terms of paragraph 2 of Art. 397 CCC and following the favourable opinion of the Audit Committee, the maintenance of the contract between the Companies and its subsidiaries and the above-mentioned law firm for the provision of legal services.
In the event of a conflict of interest between a director, on his own behalf or that of a third party, and the Company, the provisions of the Anti-Corruption Policy referred above in Point 49 are applicable, without prejudice to what is said below.
In these cases, paragraph 6 of Art. 410. CSC is also applicable. Thus, this director cannot vote on the resolutions that the Board of Directors of the Company may adopt regarding any matter in which there is a divergence between the interest, direct or indirect, of the director, and the interest of the company, and such director must inform the Chairman of the Board of Directors regarding such a conflict situation.
Business between the Company and Other Related Parties
In order to allow the Audit Committee to assess whether any existing related parties transactions have been carried out in the ordinary course of business and concluded on normal market terms and also to enable the Audit Committee, whenever required, to issue their prior opinion on any related parties transactions or transactions that may lead to conflicts of interest, the Board of Directors adopted with a binding favourable opinion from the Audit Committee, the procedure described below in point 91.